Cultural and Individual Variations in Olfactory Experiences

Explore the fascinating variations in olfactory experiences, from cultural influences and genetic differences to emotional associations and environmental impacts. This article explores how smell influences human perception across various contexts. Olfaction and gustation, i.e., the senses of smell and taste, are not purely biological phenomena experienced uniformly across humanity. Rather, they are shaped by an interplay of biological, developmental, social, and cultural factors.

Cultural Influences on Taste and Smell

Culture provides the normative frameworks that guide which flavors and odors are considered desirable, neutral, or aversive. These frameworks arise from cuisine, religious practice, food availability, socialization patterns, and symbolic meanings assigned to odors and tastes.

• Learned preferences and acquired tastes: Many flavor preferences are learned through repeated exposure, social reinforcement, and symbolic association. Foods that are common and valued within a cultural cuisine tend to be experienced as pleasant by members of that culture because of familiarity and positive social contexts in which they are consumed (Rozin & Schiller, 1980; Schwarz & Clore, 2007). For example, fermentation is central to many Asian diets—fermented vegetables such as kimchi in Korea or natto in Japan—producing strong, pungent flavors and odors that are culturally prized despite being challenging for someone without that cultural exposure (Park & Lee, 2011).
• Culture-specific valence of particular odors: Some odors evoke opposite reactions across cultures because of learned associations and historical context. The durian fruit is a well-known example: in many Southeast Asian societies, its custardy texture and rich odor are associated with culinary delight and cultural identity; in many Western contexts, the same odor compounds are appraised as foul or overpowering (Zellner & Durlach, 2017). The meaning attached to an odor—whether it signals freshness, spiciness, ritual purity, or decay—shapes its hedonic evaluation.
• Role of culinary norms and food availability: Culinary traditions, ingredient availability, and preservation techniques influence the odor and flavor landscape of a culture (Counihan & Van Esterik, 2013). Societies with long histories of curing, smoking, or fermenting food develop palates attuned to those sensory qualities. Conversely, the absence of certain ingredients can make corresponding flavors unfamiliar and less pleasant to outsiders.
• Social transmission of olfactory preferences: Cultural agents—parents, peers, media, and institutions—transmit taste norms. Children learn what is edible and desirable both through direct exposure (e.g., shared family meals) and via cultural narratives and ritualized contexts (Prescott & Young, 2005). The social desirability of particular foods often reinforces preferences and may override simple sensory reactions.

Individual Differences

Individual variation in olfactory and gustatory sensitivity arises from genetic, anatomical, and physiological differences, which interact with experiential history.

• Genetic polymorphisms and receptor variability: Individuals differ in receptor genes for taste and smell. For instance, polymorphisms in the TAS2R family of bitter taste receptor genes partly explain why some people perceive certain bitter compounds (like phenylthiocarbamide, PTC) as intensely bitter while others find them only mildly bitter or tasteless (Adler et al., 2000; Kim & Baek, 2016). Similarly, variation in olfactory receptor genes contributes to differences in sensitivity and odor perception (Mainland et al., 2014).
• Supertasters and taste bud density: Some individuals, sometimes termed “supertasters,” possess a higher density of fungiform papillae and taste buds on the tongue, leading to amplified taste sensations, particularly bitterness and certain oral somatosensory qualities (Bartoshuk et al., 1994). Supertasters often report stronger aversions to bitter vegetables (e.g., Brussels sprouts) and may prefer foods with milder flavor profiles.
• Sex- and age-related variation: On average, women show greater olfactory sensitivity and odor identification ability than men, though individual overlap is large (Doty & Cameron, 2009). Olfactory and gustatory sensitivity also change across the lifespan: both senses are relatively acute in childhood, can be stable through early adulthood, and often decline with aging due to receptor neuron loss, cumulative environmental exposures, and central nervous system changes (Calhoun et al., 2014).
• Health and medication effects: Health conditions (e.g., chronic rhinosinusitis, neurodegenerative diseases) and certain medications can alter olfactory and gustatory function, producing hyposmia, anosmia, dysgeusia, or parosmia, which influence hedonic and behavioral responses to flavors and odors (Hirsch & Heilmann, 2019).

Developmental and Environmental Factors

Early life experiences and ongoing environmental exposures play major roles in shaping flavor preferences and olfactory function.

• Prenatal and early postnatal flavor exposure: Flavors encountered in utero and via breast milk can influence infants’ later acceptance of the same flavors in solid foods (Mennella, Jagnow, & Beauchamp, 2001). Amniotic fluid and breast milk carry volatile and nonvolatile flavor molecules from the maternal diet, providing early sensory calibration and enhancing acceptance of culturally common foods during weaning. This phenomenon helps explain why early exposure often predicts later preference.
• Sensitive periods and repeated exposure: There are sensitive developmental windows when repeated exposure increases liking and reduces neophobia for novel foods. Repeated tasting in supportive contexts (e.g., positive family mealtime interactions) increases acceptance of initially rejected foods (Sullivan & Birch, 1994). Conversely, lack of exposure can maintain aversion or indifference.
• Environmental insults and impairment of olfactory function: Environmental factors such as air pollution, occupational chemical exposure, chronic smoking, and upper respiratory infections can damage olfactory epithelium or central olfactory pathways, reducing sensitivity and altering hedonic responses (Schiffman, 2018). Chronic smoking, for instance, is associated with diminished odor identification and threshold sensitivity, with partial recovery after cessation.
• Cumulative and interactive effects: Developmental exposures and environmental insults interact with genetic predispositions. For example, a genetically lower baseline sensitivity may be exacerbated by early deprivation of certain flavors, producing lasting differences in food preferences; conversely, rich early exposure can partially compensate for lower innate sensitivity (Birch, 1999).

Social and Emotional Dimensions

Smells do more than inform about edible substances: they serve as social signals, ritual markers, and potent triggers of emotion and memory. Cultural practices and individual histories profoundly modulate these social and emotional dimensions.

• Rituals, symbolism, and communal meaning: Many cultures incorporate specific odors into religious and social rituals—incense in temples, burning herbs in cleansing ceremonies, or spiced beverages at festivals—where smells signal identity, sanctification, or communal cohesion. The symbolic meanings attached to these odors transform raw chemical stimuli into layered cultural experiences and moral valences (Classen, Howes, & Synnott, 1994).
• Olfaction and social bonding: Shared meals and communal eating rituals are anchored in multisensory experiences where aroma plays a central role. Shared olfactory experiences can strengthen group identity and interpersonal bonds, while scent-based gift-giving (perfumes, spices) can communicate intimacy and social status (Rozin, 1996).
• Emotion, memory, and odor-evoked recollection: Odors are particularly effective at evoking autobiographical memories and intense emotional reactions (Herz & Schooler, 2002). Because olfactory pathways are closely linked to limbic structures involved in emotion and memory (e.g., amygdala, hippocampus), a culturally familiar odor can trigger nostalgia, pride, disgust, or aversion depending on personal history. For example, the smell of a traditional dish may evoke comfort and belonging in one person and discomfort or trauma-linked memories in another.
• Cultural variation in emotional responses: Cultural context influences the emotional valence attached to odors. An odor linked to a positive ritual in one culture might be neutral or negative in another; similarly, cross-cultural differences in metaphors and language for smell can shape how emotions linked to odors are recognized and described (Majid & Burenhult, 2014).

Integrative Perspective

Variation in olfactory experience emerges from multiple interacting levels:

• Biological predispositions (genetic polymorphisms, taste bud density, sex and age differences) set a baseline for sensitivity.
• Developmental exposure (prenatal, breastfeeding, early childhood diets) and repeated contact with specific flavors and odors modulate preference trajectories.
• Cultural practices, culinary systems, and symbolic meanings assign valence and social significance to odors and tastes.
• Environmental exposures and health status can augment, blunt, or distort sensory function.
• Social contexts and emotional histories determine how odors are interpreted, remembered, and used in identity-making and ritual.

This integrative framework underscores that olfactory and gustatory experiences are simultaneously personal and social, biological and cultural. Understanding these layers helps explain why seemingly intrinsic reactions to taste and smell (e.g., liking or disliking a food) can vary widely both within and between cultural groups.

Revision Exercise: Understanding Olfactory Variations

Instructions: Match each statement to the correct category (Cultural, Individual, Developmental/Environmental, Social/Emotional).

1. A person dislikes durian because they associate it with spoiled food.
2. A child exposed to garlic in breast milk later enjoys garlic-flavored foods.
3. A supertaster avoids bitter vegetables due to heightened taste sensitivity.
4. Incense used during prayer evokes feelings of peace and reverence.
5. Canadians rate wintergreen as pleasant due to its use in candy.

Answers:

1. Cultural
2. Developmental/Environmental
3. Individual
4. Social/Emotional
5. Cultural

References

Bartoshuk, L. M., Duffy, V. B., & Miller, I. J. (2006). PTC/PROP tasting: Anatomy, psychophysics, and sex effects. Physiology & Behavior, 56(6), 1165–1171. https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9384(94)90361-1

Candau, J. (2004). The olfactory experience: Constants and cultural variables. Water Science and Technology, 49(9), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2004.0522

Djordjevic, J., et al. (2016). Sniffing out cultural differences: Olfactory perception influenced by background and semantic information. Chemical Senses, 41(8), 697–706. https://neurosciencenews.com/olfactory-perception-culture-5569

Doty, R. L., & Kamath, V. (2014). The influences of age on olfaction: A review. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 20. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00020

Mennella, J. A., Jagnow, C. P., & Beauchamp, G. K. (2001). Prenatal and postnatal flavor learning by human infants. Pediatrics, 107(6), e88. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.107.6.e88t